๐ก๏ธ
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation
Security Assessment
Report
Houses of Worship โ Scored Findings & Recommendations
Assessed Facility
[Church / Organization Name]
[__]
Overall Score / 100
[ RESULT ]
Based on 10 security pillars
Prepared by: [Lead Assessor Name]
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation
[Phone] | [Email]
Sensitive โ For Official Use Only
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation — Assessment Report
This report presents the scored findings of a security assessment conducted by Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation.
Each of the 10 security pillars was assessed using a numerical scoring system โ YES (2 pts), PARTIAL (1 pt), NO (0 pts) โ
producing a Pillar Score out of 10 and an Overall Facility Score out of 100.
The score determines a Pass, Conditional Pass, or Fail result backed by objective, consistent criteria.
Foundation Principle: All recommendations are guided by de-escalation first โ equipping the church to be a place of peace, protection, and worship. Our ultimate goal is the preservation of life.
| Answer | Points | Definition |
| YES | 2 | Measure is fully in place and operational |
| PARTIAL | 1 | Measure is partially in place, in progress, or inconsistently applied |
| NO | 0 | Measure is not in place |
| N/A | โ | Not applicable to this facility โ excluded from scoring |
| Score Range | Result | Required Action |
| 85 โ 100 | EXEMPLARY | Maintain posture. Schedule annual re-assessment. |
| 70 โ 84 | PASS | Meets standard. Address minor gaps within 90 days. |
| 55 โ 69 | CONDITIONAL PASS | 90-day written action plan required. Re-assessment within 6 months. |
| 40 โ 54 | FAIL | Immediate corrective action required before next service. |
| 0 โ 39 | CRITICAL FAIL | Severe gaps. Urgent intervention required. Contact Shepherd's Shield immediately. |
โ Any individual pillar scoring below 5.0 is flagged as a priority regardless of overall score.
| Denomination / Affiliation | |
| Facility Type | |
| Operating Hours | |
| Average Weekly Attendance | |
| Staff / Volunteer Count | |
| Includes School / Childcare? | |
| Security Team in Place? | |
| Previous Security Assessment? | |
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation — Assessment Report
| # |
Security Pillar |
Score / 10 |
Score Bar |
Pillar Result |
| 1 |
๐ Security Management & Planning |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 2 |
๐ Perimeter Security & Grounds |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 3 |
๐ Parking & Traffic Safety |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 4 |
๐ช Access Control & Entry Points |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 5 |
๐ท Video Surveillance Systems |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 6 |
๐ฃ Communications & Duress Systems |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 7 |
๐๏ธ Emergency Action Plans & Drills |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 8 |
๐ฅ Security Team Readiness |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 9 |
๐ฅ Medical & First Aid Readiness |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| 10 |
๐๏ธ Interior Facility & Children's Wing |
___ |
|
[ Result ] |
| OVERALL FACILITY SCORE (sum of pillar scores รท 10) |
___ |
[ OFFICIAL RESULT ] |
โ Deficient pillars (score below 5.0) are flagged as priority items regardless of overall score.
[Write a concise summary of the overall security posture. Highlight the highest and lowest scoring pillars,
note any immediate life-safety concerns, and describe the facility's general readiness. Be specific and constructive.]
[List any pillar scoring below 5.0 โ these require immediate priority attention regardless of overall score.]
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation — Assessment Report
Record the pillar score, observations, vulnerabilities, and options for consideration for each pillar. Scores come directly from the completed assessment checklist.
Observations
[Security committee status, written plan, LEO coordination, staff training, congregation awareness.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Fencing, gates, VAAW risk, HSAA, IED concealment, vegetation compliance, exterior lighting.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Traffic flow, vehicle barriers, fire lanes, VSS coverage, pedestrian safety, emergency vehicle access.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Single entry point, visitor management, door construction, key control, lockdown capability, vestibule.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Coverage, blind spots, monitoring, recording, housing condition, LEO access, password protection.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation — Assessment Report
Observations
[Radios, PA system reach, text alerts, panic buttons, alarm systems, staff training on duress protocols.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Active threat/lockdown plan, shelter-in-place, fire evacuation, LEO/FD/EMS coordination, drills, Run-Hide-Fight, rally points, hard corners, safe havens.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Team size / armed / unarmed: ___ / ___ / ___ | Background checks, licensing, postings, training, briefings, chain of command.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[First aid kits, hemorrhage control, AED, supply readiness, staff training, supply location awareness.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Observations
[Sanctuary sight lines and lockdown, children's wing access and VSS, check-in system, volunteer vetting, offering handling, utility security.]
Vulnerabilities Identified
Options for Consideration
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation — Assessment Report
Actions are prioritized by life-safety impact. Any pillar scoring below 5.0 automatically generates a Critical or High priority item. Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation is available to assist with implementation, training, and follow-up.
| CRITICAL | Immediate life-safety risk. Address within 30 days. Temporary measures may be needed immediately. |
| HIGH | Significant vulnerability. Address within 60โ90 days. |
| MEDIUM | Moderate risk. Address within 90โ180 days. |
| LOW | Best-practice improvement. Address within 6โ12 months. |
| # | Priority | Pillar Score | Recommended Action | Assigned To | Target Date |
| 1 | Critical | [P#]: ___ /10 | [e.g., Establish and document an Active Threat / Lockdown plan. Brief all staff immediately.] | | |
| 2 | Critical | [P#]: ___ /10 | | | |
| 3 | High | [P#]: ___ /10 | [e.g., Install VSS cameras at all exterior entry/exit points with recording capability.] | | |
| 4 | High | [P#]: ___ /10 | | | |
| 5 | High | [P#]: ___ /10 | | | |
| 6 | Medium | [P#]: ___ /10 | [e.g., Procure hemorrhage control kits and train security team on Stop-the-Bleed.] | | |
| 7 | Medium | [P#]: ___ /10 | | | |
| 8 | Low | [P#]: ___ /10 | [e.g., Install Knox Box / first responder key access system at main entry.] | | |
| 9 | Low | [P#]: ___ /10 | | | |
Phase 1
0โ30 Days
Address Critical items. Brief staff & security team. Schedule Shepherd's Shield training.
Phase 2
30โ90 Days
Address High priority items. Conduct first drill. Coordinate with LEO/FD/EMS.
Phase 3
90โ180 Days
Address Medium items. Complete team training. Document all procedures.
Phase 4
180โ365 Days
Address Low items. Schedule re-assessment with SSSF. Sustain security culture.
Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation — Assessment Report
| Shepherd's Shield Service | Description | Recommended |
| Security Team Training | Armed/unarmed church security training, de-escalation, active threat response, role-specific protocols. | โ |
| Force-on-Force Scenario Training | Simunition-based scenarios tailored to church environments. Builds decision-making under stress. | โ |
| Emergency Action Plan Development | Custom written plans (active threat, shelter-in-place, fire) specific to this facility's layout. | โ |
| Congregation Safety Seminar | Run-Hide-Fight, See Something/Say Something, and situational awareness for the congregation. | โ |
| Stop-the-Bleed / First Aid Training | Hemorrhage control, AED, and emergency medical response training for staff and volunteers. | โ |
| Annual Re-Assessment | Follow-up assessment to measure score improvement and identify new or evolving risks. | โ |
| Re-Assessment Date Recommended | |
| Training Engagement Proposed | |
| Church Follow-Up Contact | |
| SSSF Follow-Up Contact | |
The assessor certifies this report was completed in good faith using the Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation scoring methodology, based on conditions observed on the assessment date.
This report is SENSITIVE and intended solely for the use of the assessed facility and Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation. Store securely. Do not distribute without authorization from both parties.
Lead Assessor Signature
Name: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
Church / Facility Representative
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
SSSF Director Review
Name: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
๐ก๏ธ Shepherd's Shield Safety Foundation
"Protecting the Flock. Preserving Life. Glorifying God."
We are committed to walking alongside faith-based communities โ not just assessing risk, but equipping your team with the training, plans, and confidence to protect those in your care.
Contact: [Phone] | [Email] | [Website]
The table below summarizes the policy review conducted during the assessment. Policies are rated as Written & Current, Written & Outdated, Verbal Only, or None.
| Policy |
Status |
Last Reviewed |
Notes |
| Security & Emergency Management Plan | | | |
| Lockdown / Active Threat Response Policy | | | |
| Child Protection / Safe Church Policy | | | |
| Volunteer & Staff Background Check Policy | | | |
| Access Control & Key Management Policy | | | |
| Cash & Offering Handling Policy | | | |
| Weapons & Firearms Policy | | | |
| Incident Reporting & Documentation Policy | | | |
| Crisis Communications Policy | | | |
| Video Surveillance (VSS) & Privacy Policy | | | |
| Medical Emergency Response Policy | | | |
| Threat & Suspicious Behavior Reporting Policy | | | |
| Social Media & Photography Policy | | | |
| Visitor Management Policy | | | |